Thursday, January 3, 2013

Apple acknowledges Do Not Disturb bug, says it will magically fix itself on January 8th

Apple acknowledges Do Not Disturb bug, says it will magically fix itself on January 7th

Well, it's no "you're holding it wrong," but we can't say we're 100 percent satisfied with Apple's response to the recent discovery of a bug affecting iOS's Do Not Disturb feature. Starting January first, ringers failed to turn back on after the predetermined silent period. Today Cupertino seemed to acknowledge the existence of the flaw but, rather than offer a patch, it simply told customers to be patient:

"Do Not Disturb scheduling feature will resume normal functionality after January 7, 2013. Before this date, you should manually turn the Do Not Disturb feature on or off."

Understandably, it'll probably take longer than five days to find the offending code, whip up a fix, test it and roll it out to users. Still, a thorough explanation is always appreciated and the iOS faithful have already been patient enough.

Filed under: ,

Comments

Via: CNET

Source: Apple

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/02/apple-acknowledges-do-not-disturb-bug/

vicki gunvalson pierre garcon brown recluse spider wiz khalifa taylor allderdice eddie royal iditarod nfl free agents 2012

Typical American without a landline: A 27-year old Latino living in Columbus, Ohio

US Landline Usage Study 2012Smartphones

The statistical study compiled by NHIS about?landline and mobile phone usage in American households is a pretty fascinating read. The number of U.S. adults with a mobile phone but no landline rose to 34% in the first half of 2012. That percentage is ticking up roughly two points every six months ? a fairly rapid clip. The number of adults with a landline but no mobile phone plunged below 8% according to the study, which was picked up by GigaOm. These numbers may explain why some of the pollsters using landline-only calls in the last election ran off the rails so spectacularly. So many Americans can no longer be reached via a landline phone that polling methods simply must be adjusted.

[More from BGR: ?iPhone 5S? to reportedly launch by June with multiple color options and two different display sizes]

Latinos are far more likely to have a mobile-only household (46%) than non-hispanic whites (30%) according to the study; this gap is surprisingly large. The number of 25- to 29-year-old adults living in a mobile-only household hit a remarkable 60% in the beginning of 2012. There is a sharp generational divide here: Fewer than 25% of 45- to 64-year-old Americans have dared to drop the landline.

[More from BGR: Nokia predicted to abandon mobile business, sell assets to Microsoft and Huawei in 2013]

Somewhat surprisingly, the Midwest is the region with the highest level of mobile-only households. Naturally, metropolitan households are more likely to depend solely on mobile phones than suburban or rural households. For the first time ever, women edged out men as the larger group of mobile-only adults.

Back in 2006, only 10% of adults lived in a mobile-only household. Americans are kicking their landline habit with remarkable alacrity considering that many homes with small children still feel that depending solely on a mobile phone is too risky.

This article was originally published by BGR

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/typical-american-without-landline-27-old-latino-living-205120175.html

masters golf tournament the replacements how to hard boil eggs new nfl uniforms easter derbyshire the matrix

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

UPDATE 1-Singapore economy grew by 1.2 pct in 2012 - PM

(Adds details, economists' comment)

SINGAPORE, Dec 31 (Reuters) - Singapore's economy grew by

1.2 percent in 2012, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said on

Monday, indicating the city-state slipped into a recession in

the last three months of the year.

Credit Suisse economist Michael Wan, in a note to clients,

estimated that 1.2 percent growth for the year implies the

economy "contracted sequentially by 2 percent quarter-on-quarter

annualised in the fourth quarter."

"Following the minus 5.9 percent quarter-on-quarter

seasonally adjusted and annualised rate in the previous quarter,

we think that the economy has likely entered a technical

recession," Wan added. His estimates assumed no revisions to

data for the first three quarters.

Singapore, whose trade is around three times GDP, has been

badly hit by the weakness in Western economies that has crimped

demand for many of its exports. The city-state's electronic

manufacturers have also failed to tap surging demand for smart

phones, unlike rivals in South Korea and Taiwan.

For the first 11 months of 2012, electronics production fell

11.1 percent compared with the same period last year,

underscoring the weakness in the export markets, according to

industrial production data released last week.

Lee, in his New Year message, said "Growth was slower this

year, at 1.2 percent. The weak U.S., European and Japanese

economies dampened our growth, but some industries have also had

difficulty hiring the workers they need to grow."

Looking ahead, the Singapore prime minister said the economy

will likely expand by 1-3 percent in 2013, reiterating an

earlier government forecast.

"In our new phase, we must expect slower growth than we have

become accustomed to," Lee added, referring to government

efforts to raise productivity rather than rely on low-cost

foreign workers to boost economic activity.

Singapore's economy grew by 4.9 percent in 2011 and the

government's latest forecast for 2012, just made in November,

had been for expansion of around 1.5 percent. The 1.2 percent

growth cited by Lee was, however, slightly higher than the 1.1

percent estimate of most economists in a Reuters poll.

Credit Suisse's Wan said the government measures to make it

harder for firms to hire cheap labour from abroad will crimp

Singapore's economic performance in the near term.

"We expect less productive companies to start to get weeded

out in 2013 as restructuring bites... Businesses that have not

made the necessary adjustments to survive in the island-state's

high-cost environment will choose to relocate, or throw in the

towel completely," he said.

The Straits Times newspaper reported earlier on Monday that

some retailers in the city-state have complained of poor

December sales, with revenue rising by just 5 percent despite

deep discounts and a boom in visitor arrivals.

Rising rents and the strong Singapore dollar have made the

city-state more expensive, and people are doing more of their

shopping when they are in other countries or buying off the

internet, the retailers said.

The government will release advance estimates for the fourth

quarter on Jan 2.

(Reporting by Kevin Lim; Editing by Richard Borsuk)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/1-singapore-economy-grew-1-2-pct-2012-094224793--business.html

Happy new year fiscal cliff Hannah Storm Outback Bowl kathy griffin jenny mccarthy crystal harris

Use a Manilla Folder as a Knife Protector to Transport Your Blades Safely

Use a Manilla Folder as a Knife Protector to Transport Your Blades SafelyUse a Manilla Folder as a Knife Protector to Transport Your Blades Safely If you're taking your kitchen knives to be professionally sharpened or you're packing your kitchen to move, you probably need a safer way to transport them than just tossing them in a bag and hoping for the best. Thankfully, you likely already have the solution: A simple manilla folder.

The video above from America's Test Kitchen walks you through the process, but it's not rocket science. Just measure the size of the knife against the folder you want to use, and use the already-folded edge of the folder as a natural pocket to rest the blade against. Cut to fit, and staple or secure the open side so the knife doesn't just fall out. Then you can put the knives into a bag safely and take them anywhere you need them.

How to Make a Homemade Knife Protector | America's Test Kitchen

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/6Zrwhs0XxHA/use-a-manilla-folder-as-a-knife-protector-to-transport-your-blades-safely

college football college football ncaa football brian van gorder blazing saddles lsu alabama lsu game

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

3 Tips For Finding A Patent Attorney | Quality Life Resources

patent-attorneyLiving in the era of great technological advancement means that intellectual property is now much more valuable than it once was. However, having an idea, does not mean that one will prosper off it.

This is only the first of many steps towards commercializing an idea, and making money from it. Other steps involve nourishing the idea, investing in it, and, most crucially, protecting the idea from others. This, most vital, part of commercializing an idea can also be the most complex step that you take, since registering a patent is not an easy job. This is why there are numerous attorneys at law that specialize in the area of patenting and intellectual property.

If you want your idea to flourish, it is only natural that you would want it to be in safe and knowledgeable hands. This is why hiring a good and trusted patent attorney is very important. But, first things first. You must first decide what do you need the lawyer for and what type of a patent lawyer suit your needs in the best possible manner.

Doing the research ? know what you need

When dealing with the subject of intellectual property, it is vital to know that this area of the law covers a wide range of legal issues that need to be addressed in the proper manner. Entertainment law, media law, contract law and copyright law are just some parts of the law that need to be addressed in order to be completely sure that your patent is protected.

However, this all depends on the nature of your idea. If you decide on solely embarking on a creating and selling innovative ideas and products, then an attorney that is strictly specialized in the areas of copyright and patenting is what you need. However, if you wish to publicize your product, you deal with designs and plan on working online, then you would need someone who is also well-learned in the area of media law, as well as patents and copyright.


It is also advised that you see exactly how much, and what type of, competition you currently have on the market. This can be done by going through the Patent Office Register and checking whether there are already patented ideas that are similar to yours. Having more competition means that you must hire a more experienced lawyer to deal with the situation. This, however, means that you will have to pay more money for legal protection.

For business owners whose businesses have a legal department, as well, it would be advisable to check whether the attorneys at the resident legal department are skilled in those areas of the law, because, if they are, then your business would spend a lot less money on legal representation.

Know where to search

Finding a good patent attorney may not be as easy as you might think. The absolute worst thing that you can do (and this is not only for finding an attorney, but for any profession) is to go on Google and search ?patent attorneys?. This will only yield promoted results that are certainly not good enough for your needs. Also, you should avoid asking around business and private circles for a good attorney, because recommendations can usually be very subjective and can only misguide you in your search.

The most advisable way is to consult the website of a government agency that is concerned with patents, and obtain a list of registered patent attorneys and law firms. These lists will offer a variety of filters that will make it easier for you to find exactly what kind of a lawyer you need. When you have selected a few, conduct a Google search for them, and see how they are represented on the Internet.

Meeting eye-to-eye ? doing the preliminary interview

Once you have selected a few attorneys that you think will suit you the best, the final step in choosing the right one would be to go and find their offices. There you can see whether they are taking new clients and you can schedule an interview.

It is in both your and the attorney?s best interest that this interview goes as best as possible. He must suit your need, but you must prove to be a valuable customer, as well. This is why you should approach this interview as you would a business meeting. Go well-dressed and well-prepared.

State your case and see if you can interest the attorney in your case. If the attorney deems the venture profitable and you see that he or she is trustworthy, then you should let him or her handle your patent case. If not, keep searching until you find a good match.

Protecting the idea and obtaining a patent is too complex a task to be performed by someone who is a layman in this area of the law. This is why it is recommended that you let a patent attorney handle the process instead, since he or she will know what to do and how. Choosing a right attorney for you can be complicated, but following these guidelines will hopefully make the process easier.

Featured images:
  • License: Royalty Free or iStock?source: http://www.123rf.com

This is a guest post.? Damian is a blogger and a freelance writer. He mostly writes about finance and business, but other topics are not strange for him. Damian currently works for phoenixip.com.au patent attorneys from Australia.

Source: http://www.qualityliferesources.com/money/3-tips-for-finding-a-patent-attorney/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=3-tips-for-finding-a-patent-attorney

mario manningham mario manningham williams syndrome hoya casa de mi padre corned beef and cabbage diners drive ins and dives

The Copyright Monopoly Is A Legal Featherweight Compared To ...

In our series of misconceptions about the copyright monopoly, some people defending the monopoly keep asserting that it carries the same legal weight as property rights. This is not so much misguided, as it is merely factually wrong from every angle.

When faced with the fact that the copyright monopoly is a limitation of property rights, some defenders of the monopoly claim that property rights and the copyright monopoly ?carry equal legal weight anyway?, in an attempt to downplay that argument?s importance in the debate about the copyright monopoly?s legitimacy. Their claim calls for fact checking and further scrutiny.

When comparing the copyright monopoly to the property rights that it limits, we can go to the constitution of many countries to compare their respective weights. Starting with the US Constitution, we can readily observe that property rights are a long-running tradition of the British Common Law, and find several passages that limit Congress? ability to curtail those property rights by law.

One of the most-quoted of these passages may be in the US Bill of Rights, in the Fifth Amendment: ??nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation?.

In contrast to safeguarding property rights, the US Constitution does not require the Congress to have any copyright monopoly at all on the law books, but merely grants Congress the power to enact such a monopoly (?exclusive rights?) if it finds that doing so promotes the development of culture and knowledge.

We find this passage in Chapter 8 of the US Constitution: ?[Congress has the right] ?to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.?

The right to create the monopoly ? but not the obligation.

So, property rights are constitutionally safeguarded, whereas the copyright monopoly may exist as a law or it may not, as Congress desires from day to day. That is obviously not the same legal weight. The copyright monopoly is a featherweight by comparison.

Other countries show the same pattern. Let?s look at Sweden, where property rights are similarly protected in the constitution.

In Sweden?s Regeringsformen constitution, chapter 2 para 15, we find that ??the property of everyone shall be safe against expropriation to public or private interests, except when needed to accommodate urgent public interests?, in which case full compensation blah blah. Pretty much a mirror image of the US Bill of Rights. And what do we find about the copyright monopoly? It is indeed in the constitution, in the very next paragraph:

Chapter 2, para 16: ?Authors, photographers, and artists have rights to their works that are determined by ordinary law? [as decided by Parliament].

Thus, we observe the same difference in legal weight here ? the property rights are heavily safeguarded in the constitution, with no rights for Parliament to jeopardize them, whereas the copyright monopoly can be abolished, changed radically, or turned into ice cream tomorrow if the Swedish Parliament so desires.

That is obviously not the same legal weight. The copyright monopoly is a featherweight by comparison.

You've read the whole article. Why not subscribe to the RSS flow using your favorite reader, or even have articles delivered by mail?

About The Author: Rick Falkvinge

Rick is the founder of the first Pirate Party and is a political evangelist, traveling around Europe and the world to talk and write about ideas of a sensible information policy. He has a tech entrepreneur background and loves whisky.

Source: http://falkvinge.net/2012/12/30/the-copyright-monopoly-is-a-legal-featherweight-compared-to-property-rights/

cyber monday lupus iCarly banana republic gap Victoria Secret Bath And Body Works

After big wins in 2012, pro-marijuana groups set their sights on other states

California and Oregon could be the next states to legalize marijuana, as pro-pot groups that spent decades campaigning seek to capitalize on 2012 victories in Washington and Colorado.

By Alex Dobuzinskis,?Reuters / December 30, 2012

Marijuana plants flourishing under the lights at a grow house in Denver Nov. 8. President Barack Obama says he won't go after Washington state and Colorado for legalizing marijuana.

Ed Andrieski/AP/File

Enlarge

After a decades-long campaign to legalize marijuana hit a high mark in 2012 with victories in?Washington?state and?Colorado, its energized and deep-pocketed backers are mapping out a strategy for the next round of ballot-box battles.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

They have their sights set on possible ballot measures in 2014 or 2016 in states such as?California?and?Oregon, which were among the first in the country to allow marijuana for medical use. Although those states more recently rejected broader legalization, drug-law reform groups remain undeterred.

"Legalization is more or less repeating the history of medical marijuana," said?Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the?Drug Policy Alliance. "If you want to know which states are most likely to legalize marijuana, then look at the states that were the first to legalize medical marijuana."

A political arm of the alliance spent more than $1.6 million as one of the main funders of the?Washington?state campaign.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/CeV-Dvy2l-4/After-big-wins-in-2012-pro-marijuana-groups-set-their-sights-on-other-states

the bourne legacy roland martin suspended lake vostok montgomery county public schools the river dr dog ke$ha